• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 小时前

    I mean, that’s a curious anecdote. But it doesn’t explain why they would have been better at the math prior to 1970

    • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 小时前

      As with all anecdotes, it does not explain itself, but I can explain this one: repetition.

      I don’t think that was really in question though and both you and the other person have already responded genuinely, which makes this interaction less fun than I was intending, because I had hoped my anecdote would be taken as the joke it was.

      Them’s the breaks over text sometimes.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 小时前

        I can explain this one: repetition.

        Several of them did not believe me even after went through a couple examples.

        :-/

        Again, nothing in this story explains why calculators are to blame. If anything, it illustrates how calculators are useful.

        • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 小时前

          Several times vs several thousand times makes a difference 🤷

          But hey, take it as a point for you if you want! Calculators are useful.