Live results here via Brazil’s UOL.

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This is why I really like the run-off system of the non-instant variety. It gives people a clear choice and a chance to think. People that might not have voted the first round see a stark choice and may think “yeah I better go vote or we’ll have another Bolsanaro running things and I don’t want that.”

    Congrats to Brazil!

    • Hapankaali@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The two-round system is actually very similar in its dynamics to instant runoff voting or FPTP with primaries. All these systems feature a centre squeeze. FPTP without primaries is actually a better system, albeit obviously still vastly inferior to a proportional system, which is what all top-tier democracies (and economies for that matter) use. In the FPTP-without-primary era, the US still had statesmen with broad support as presidents (e.g., FDR, Eisenhower, Theodore Roosevelt), and the election of a Trump would have been unfathomable (at least, on the Republican ticket).

      • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        But why multiple election days when you can have a preferential voting system that has runoff inbuilt?

        Thank goodness for this outcome though.

        • smeenz@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Because it provides for the opportunity to strategically vote based on the results of the previous round.

          • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 hours ago

            But it’s still down to two and you have one preference. What’s the strategy?