stenAanden@feddit.dk to Curated Tumblr@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 7 hours agoWhat is skinnyfeddit.dkimagemessage-square80fedilinkarrow-up1262arrow-down16
arrow-up1256arrow-down1imageWhat is skinnyfeddit.dkstenAanden@feddit.dk to Curated Tumblr@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 7 hours agomessage-square80fedilink
minus-squarerumschlumpel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 hours agoBut “not skinny” is not the same as “the opposite of skinny”.
minus-squarevelma@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·3 hours agoAt 5’10" and between 115-130lbs, Taylor Swift is skinny. She is thin. She is not overweight. She is bordering on underweight. The pictures in the post are also taken from slightly below which will make her thighs look slightly bigger due to the lens distortion.
minus-squareAnon7394@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·58 minutes agoShe’s also not unhealthily underweight, and therefore not skinny.
minus-squareTwoTiredMice@feddit.dklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 hours agoAgree on the lens distortion here. Not a lot people is looking good from that angle.
minus-squarerumschlumpel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-23 hours agoIn this picture, I’d call her “normal”. The physique that’s basically the norm for “sexy” celebrity women is squarely in the underweight range.
But “not skinny” is not the same as “the opposite of skinny”.
At 5’10" and between 115-130lbs, Taylor Swift is skinny. She is thin. She is not overweight. She is bordering on underweight.
The pictures in the post are also taken from slightly below which will make her thighs look slightly bigger due to the lens distortion.
She’s also not unhealthily underweight, and therefore not skinny.
Agree on the lens distortion here. Not a lot people is looking good from that angle.
In this picture, I’d call her “normal”. The physique that’s basically the norm for “sexy” celebrity women is squarely in the underweight range.