What about 2^31521281 - 1, I’m pretty sure that’s a perfect odd number

Damn, subscription services really got out of hand, even your glasses have one now

Well, you see:

https://web.archive.org/web/20220409214808/https://lockheedmartinstore.com/product/rainbow-socks/

You see, there is exactly one person working for newspapers who is in charge of writing articles.

Whenever they write something criticizing something I am obsessed with, it’s the only article posted on a given day and meant to distract the sheeple from some other horrific thing going on at the same time. That’s not whataboutism, it’s different because I’m doing it.

We also know building nuclear takes 20 years and costs more than building thrice the capacity in renewables + Germany has no long-term nuclear storage, only temporary one’s a la Simpsons.

I’m sure people who accept the realistic risk of drowning - most cannot swim - will be discouraged by the threat of… being in a prison with better living conditions than their home?

deleted by creator

But then parliament isn’t all powerful, is it? See the omnipotence paradox:

A similar problem occurs when accessing legislative or parliamentary sovereignty, which holds a specific legal institution to be omnipotent in legal power, and in particular such an institution’s ability to regulate itself.

And tbh, a parliament which cannot regulate itself is a fairly powerless parliament.

Do you think the people who fear migration care the slightest bit about anyone but themselves?

An awful number of them would support attacking rafts filled with refugees with military warships.

Imagine not being turned into a puppy by feminism, sucks to suck

Can’t they create a law which says that the PM cannot do something without 80% of the votes and that the law itself requires the same amount of votes to be modified or superseded in any way?

It’s weird, I absolutely adored Tunic, it’s one of my favorite games of all time, yet Outer Wilds was just “alright” for me? Like IGN 7/10 good but nothing to write home about.

Part of that was probably because I felt constant nausea due to being unaccustomed to playing 3D games with controller - the fact half of the game occured in space with two additional axis of rotation significantly worsened it.

We can keep them indefinitely then, right? If they’re not doing anything there is no need to ever revoke them.

<.<

Well, there’s only finitely many atoms in the universe, do all algorithms therefore have constant time?

Although you could argue for very large amounts of clothes my method of throwing clothes on the floor starts performing worse due to clothes falling on the same spot and piling up again.

Unless you extend your room. Let’s take a look at the ✨amortized✨time complexity.

Thay depends on the size of the pile, there could be a lot of weight and instability above the pants and you’ll have to pull them out à la Jenga or carefully rearrange the stack.

Since the amount of rearranging increases for larger n (imagine a pile reaching the ceiling), searching is in ω(1).

Ok, I didn’t understand roughly half of your comment because I don’t actually know how cache works in practice

BUT

a messy pile of clothes represents a stack, doesn’t it? And a stack makes a horrible cache because unlike a simple array you don’t have fast random access. You’d have to dig through the entire pile of clothes to get to the bottom which takes a lot of time.

Why would you use a pile out of all data structures, only adding is in ϴ(1), searching is in ϴ(n).

I suggest throwing the clothes on the floor and remembering the spot they landed on. That’s ϴ(1) for adding and for searching, far superior to a stack of clothes on a chair.

Side note: fuck big O notation, use big ϴ notation >:(