Just shows he was only speaking out because he thought he would make money from it, not because of any ethical principles.

It wasn’t tariffs but the annexation threats that have driven the boycott.

They could, but obviously these people would be against that. Because they don’t have a rational objection, they’re just bigots.

He also won re-election running as an independent, well after the rape charges were known and he was kicked out of his party and suspended from parliament. But that wasn’t enough for the people of his electorate to go: “Err maybe this rapist isn’t the best option to represent us.”

“Globalism” invariably means some sort of conspiracy theory, usually about Jews. Given this party are also anti-vaxxers, that’s the most plausible conclusion.

And a broader coalition among the rest of the Western countries including Europe and Australia/NZ etc makes more sense than duplicating effort in every country.