Yes, no problem with that

I have several flags:

• when people is not able to focus a discussion in the specific thema and tend to divage
• when somebody is reassuring that two things are same/not same but they can explain why they are the same or not
• when they are not able to identify a contradiction in their own arguments, and once you point on that still negates the contradiction
• when don’t know how to explain difficult / advance concepts they should master in easy terms / vocabulary

And a few more, but not so strong like these ones

So you are impliciting saying that this behavior will damage the profit share of shop and nothing else, because almost nothing will be reverted into the workers.

And only once the share profit is not enough, excuse me, decided to be insuficiente by the ceo to fulfill the gross margin of the full multinational company, those workers will suffer the consequences even if there were not any stealing.

It is ironic that this appears in a post about understanding difficult and not obvious relationships between complex concepts :)

And no, I am not justifying anything, this post in only for the sake of understanding a complex pattern

The negative one!

:)

I don’t like the tone of the news, it is not ideal but it is much better than showed by this one.

A little more unbiased sourceB https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2025

Same here, the only time I had a problem was the Nvidia driver updating and breaking the compatibility.

It was Nvidia, it is always Nvidia…

He is not really pro-palestine but anti-genocide.

Small but important difference