That almost makes sense, but pi radians = 180°
Right, a triangle “has 180deg,” like I said.
in which case π÷n is infinitesimally small. In other words, substituting infinity for n would be incalculable
That’s not how limits work. Substitution is not the same as taking the limit.
infinite and infinitesimal numbers are impossible to express rationally.
That’s not true at all. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1/2_%2B_1/4_%2B_1/8_%2B_1/16_%2B_⋯
It’s not about colloquialism or language
Having one word (or phrase) with two meanings is a property of language.







“Can the US lose in a way that allows the crazies in office to save face in their eyes?” seems an important question to me. Because if the options are the US clearly losing vs. the US clearly losing but nuking Iran so everyone loses…