neoman4426

Unless it’s already to the point that it’s super advanced, and it was intentionally playing dumb to lull you into a false sense of security /s

I mean, what would be the point at this point? Majority of the country is apparently okay with Epstein style activities given his best friend who has bragged about having the same tastes got elected

2002’s “A Very Muppet Christmas” is an “It’s a Wonderful Life” style movie where Kermit temporarily wishes himself out of existence and is allowed to observe the resulting timeline. Shots of the Manhattan skyline in the main universe show no Twin Towers as expected, but there’s a shot that clearly shows them in the background outside alternate Piggy’s window. Wasn’t an intentional bit of canon, just an little detail that arose from the set designers not realizing the Towers were in that old window backdrop they used, but the implication is hilarious

He’s also canonically in the chain of causality that determines whether or not 9/11 happens in the Muppet universe. I don’t know if that’s a positive or a negative for the point being made.

Then the bit with the ad read at the end for a drink powder that was apparently “Grandpa’s ashes” flavor, realizing halfway through and being like “welp, that’s staying in”

I always think about that time in the 90s cartoon where Xavier made Magneto relive the Holocaust. Like, dude was about to kill him and enact a genocide of his own, but still, damn.

So you’re saying there is one? Because the line that’s replaced here is Tighten saying “There’s no Queen of England” with the point of the scene being showing he’s dumb for thinking something that does exist is like the other mythological things listed