You’re confusing losing land because you can’t hold it militarily with negotiating an end to the invasion by ceding land. He’s said that no one will negotiate for Ukraine but Ukraine and since the incoming US administration has already said they’ll be ending support we really don’t have any leverage to encourage them to accept any terms. We can’t threaten to remove support that we’ve already said we’re removing.
There’s no threat needed. Zalenskyy already knows he’s losing US support after January.
This is literally Zalenskyy saying we can’t negotiate for him while knowing that he’s losing US support in January.
They could negotiate Russia’s end to the war using their own resources (ie. Mostly the embargos) but anything Ukraine forfeits would have to be negotiated by them. The US can’t just cede another nation’s land.
Yes let’s take the most wildly liked billionaire and make them our example. Surely that will convince people to join us.
Or it was just your area reverting back to the prevailing trend. Microeconomics vs macro.
Your house matches their estimates and you’re questioning their numbers?
Why would they ever make that known to the public. Would be a huge invasion of the competitors privacy. Kinda weird.
It was pot for Phelps
What’s the alternative though?
It’s the cornerstone of their methloften line.
He’s like Moses for felons