

If that’s true, it’s in the billionaires best interest to help, but I feel like their solutions are slavery or autonomous robots instead of wealth redistribution.
If that’s true, it’s in the billionaires best interest to help, but I feel like their solutions are slavery or autonomous robots instead of wealth redistribution.
Red scare, don’t let me down now!
All roads lead to China Main St.
What you say is true, but also ignores the alt-right pipelining that YouTube and others are seemingly complicit in, or at the very least is the result of perverse incentives.
And I’ll say the exact same thing about TikTok. It’s serving as primary sources for many problems around the world, it’s giving more broad and informed, collegiate level discussions of the world, and it’s full of brainrotting limbic hijacking. All true and I don’t think any generation is fully equipped to deal it.
We can also see historically that banning a “vice” has never effectively removed the vice from society.
Legally easier to ignore a ghost department.
No, I’ve seen this before. One whack to the head changes someone, but then another whack changes them back. Same principle.
Everyone with long covid just needs more covid to fix it.
The US sent 592 athletes and competed in 34 events.
China sent 388 athletes for 33 events.
These world class athletes are just better and stronger than us, so they can totally tolerate 5x the safe level. Maybe even 10x! It may be true that we don’t know how many times more they can take! A million? These are important questions that we must answer.
That’s a delightful response to my snarky comment, thank you.
I agree, the incentive structure is such that it undermines the goals of journalism. Compounded with a firehose of misinformation, even full-time journalists must be overwhelmed.
I’m unwilling to give them a pass, however. Their job is to report accurately, they understand the risk of reporting things that are not fully vetted, and choose to anyway. As you say, they’re complicit.
Surely you’re not accusing the media of any malfeasance!
To paraphrase GW “Fascism me once, shame on you. Fascism me twice? … Can’t get fascism-ed again!”
This article is from 2018 and talks a bit about the suspected causes of increased myopia. The theory is that our eyes are responding to the environment and elongating (axial myopia). So it’s not that humans have lost the ability to have good vision via selection, it’s that we’re adapting to screen vision.
Your point about natural selection is well addressed by @[email protected] already.
Quick Wiki look says the dance originated on this tv performance about 3 months after the song was released.
There’s an aphorism that science progresses one funeral at a time, but I wonder if the same could be said of culture.
I hope it’s not headed for Buenos Aires, but I’m ready to do my part.