4·
3 days agoYeah I made a seperate post about it being highly misleading
- 9 Posts
- 337 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: July 5th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
I live in Denmark and remember this from when I happened.
Check the description of this video
Just to be clear. This is a video that is a year old
This is highly misleading. Especially that they have 2026 on the video
This is a year old. Was filmed 24 January 2025
This! 👆
He basically is allowed to do whatever he wants. And people thinking that it is a distraction from the Epstein files, don’t realize that he’d be able to walk away from anything they hold too. The problem is not Trump it’s the enablers who won’t stop him
It’s not the point
I have done more for NATO
As if it’s his money! 💰🤦
“chilling”…
I’m tired of the media calling normal human rights heartwarming and news like this “chilling”
An 80 old woman being able to go on retiremen or a child being able to pay for prosthetic limbs because of charity is not heartwarming. These are the real chilling facts.
An action against a President who does not respect international law should be heartwarming although it’s drastic
And yeah… I might be on a list now and not able to enter the USA… 🤷
The countries are indeed damaged because of it but not even close to as bad as it hurts the US population
Peace for our time" was a declaration made by British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain in his 30 September 1938 remarks in London concerning the Munich Agreement and the subsequent Anglo-German Declaration.[1] The phrase echoed Benjamin Disraeli, who, upon returning from the Congress of Berlin in 1878, had stated, “Lord Salisbury and myself have brought you back peace — but a peace I hope with honour.” The phrase is primarily remembered for its bitter ironic value since less than a year after the agreement, Germany’s invasion of Poland began World War II.
The Danish Foreign minister mentioned Chamberlain 3-4 times today after the meeting at the white house, clearly stating that he was not that and he could not promise peace
This is the point though and the greatest issue seen from the rest of the world. The problem is not Trump but the American people who support ideas like that
Edit: directly support or are passive when it comes to choosing
I hope that this is not true. Trust in the USA won’t come back, without many decades of active work by the USA to regain it
🏴☠️🦜🏴☠️🦜
They’ll soon have wooden pegs for legs and prosthetic hooks for hands
Denmark right now…
Sounds like a threat to me…
Imagine what could happen if she wouldn’t give it to him
It’s optimistic to count on laws having any serious influence on the consequences that breaking them should have
Denmark has ever since WW2 allowed the USA to build as many military bases as they wish on Greenland. With basically no questions asked. The reason the USA wants Greenland is not because of national security. They have access to it for that. They want the resources
Thanks for calling it what it is!
Although according to Wikipedia
Annexation can be legitimized if generally recognized by other states and international bodies.[8][9][2]
The illegality of annexation means that states carrying out such acts usually avoid using the word annexation in describing their actions;[10][11] in each of the unresolved annexations by Israel, Morocco and Russia, the states have avoided characterizing their actions as such.[11][12]
Where did he do this today? In 2025 it was during the European Parliament in Strasbourg.