But it’s not. DEI confuses equality of opportunity with equality of outcome. Opportunities must be fair and equal to all, because giving a certain boost to someone else inherently discriminates against another person (not to mention the immorality of giving opportunity based simply on biological characteristics in the first place.) Along with that, DEI doesn’t actually do this for a measurable group of people who could use a boost, ie people of the lower class, it assumes the disadvantages certain groups face on the whole and fail at compensating for any. If you want actual equality of outcome, you need a fair system of opportunity, where actual disadvantaged people are not stopped from achieving things advantaged people could (like paid university by the government based on income.) But forced diversity is not diversity, it’s discrimination. Just look at the whole affirmative action controversy when Asian people were discriminated against.

Relevant

Anyways this is fucking anarchy chess, en passant or whatever. New move just dropped

This is a funny critique, but DEI itself is really just racism; people getting chosen only because of quotas, not because of ability. MLK would roll over in his grave if he saw what we were doing now.

Pretty obvious it’s in its alpha stages. Nice that he stuck with the pattern though, he really nailed in on the first try.

Me looking at all the flags on the left of the peers table 😀

This is exactly the type of thing I love.