old profile: /u/[email protected]

  • 30 Posts
  • 65 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 16th, 2023

help-circle












  • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.comto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I am honestly a bit impressed by how you managed to read all this into OP’s pic. Literally nothing there is about using Facebook, being guilted(???) into using it, nothing suggests that leftists shouldn’t build their own spaces. Are you really responding to the pic or to something else?








  • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.comto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneframed rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    And then also how is it bridged to glowie?

    Just like how you have “newfag” and its more civilised equivalent “newbie” (though the two terms are more independent from each other, the latter is older).

    where did you see that and what makes you think this association extends into the wider world?

    Youtube, 4chan and similar shithole sites that directly followed Terry Davis, and which initially formed and adopted the lingo. Many such people are also in the circles that focus on privacy, distrust of the state and big tech companies bordering on paranoid, etc. (4chan’s /g/ in particular)

    I have seen the old r/waterniggers

    It was just r/waterniggas. And IIRC it wasn’t generally meant to be racist, so the shift to r/hydrohomies was tolerated. They got banned just due to the name, not behaviour of the users. It’s really not equivalent to people laughing at and making memes out of a schizophrenic man spouting racism.


  • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.comto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneframed rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s safe to say that the vast majority of people using the term know about its origin, and it’s not mere association, but literal origin (see the video above), and also the original form “glownigger” is still widely used (it’s bizarre that it’s on the end of the list on Wikipedia, in fact, after some forms that are probably barely used). Otherwise “glowie” doesn’t make much sense at all, doesn’t it? It’s a softened version pto avoid the overt racism, but it still gives a wink to it.





  • I was suspicious at first too, but now as weird as the whole scenario looks my skepticism has weakened (e.g. people say he’s been missing from work during the shooting, the unibrow may have been simply visually deformed by the shitty camera, etc.).

    But you know what, I think it’s better to stop trying to be smarter than what is reasonably possible, and at the very least wait and see what he and his lawyer will have to say in the court. E.g. if the evidence was fabricated, they will certainly try to argue that. Not everything about the story will clear up, but some things can, and I say it’s better to wait it out with a bit of patience.

    Besides, what if it really wasn’t Luigi and we’ve all been duped? How will the fanboys and fangirls lusting after him feel? What will the smart businessmen do with their leftover Saint Luigi candles?