They already did, it’s paying of the debt.

Lets hope the aging process accelerates from now on.

Didn’t he say something along the lines that EU was created to fuck with the US? Whatever officials and analysts see this as indifference to Europe need to be fired.

edit: reading the article’s first paragraph, yes he did

Always thought this makes a lot of sense. An attack on one EU country is a severe disruption on all other. Before Sweden and Finland joined NATO, would the EU have been able to continue business as usual without joining in? That said I know a lot of people oppose it because they see it as one step closer to becoming a federation and getting rid of the nation states.

The distinction being that they will not be stationed in areas with active combat, but rather as a militarized police? Sounds like the distinction is quite subtle in reality and might be (willingly or not) misinterpreted, no?

and stands ready to contribute troops if necessary.

Won’t this trigger a Russia-NATO war?

Careful Australia, or Trumpatron will slap you with coal tariffs.

This is quite unrelated to Trump though I think? China has been offering these kinds of deals for a very long time. Relations with Sweden were severely soured a while back in part due to denial of some railway infrastructure deal (was denied due to national security reasons IIRC).

A person I know who grew up in China (now living in Europe) described US under this new administration as “China with guns”.

Something like this is why I put an if in “if the US ever has another election”.

Obviously this is not something you can base a deal on, but I think a lot of the stupid shit Trump is doing will be undone if the US ever has another election. So in four years, the deal will be overturned or renegotiated. Maybe it can even be declared void?

People can weasel themselves around terms like “fascist” quite easily, because there are multiple definitions, many are very diffuse and there’s a lot of disagreement around it - but ethnic cleansing to my understanding is quite simple and this is it. Can any serious political commentator pretend it’s not? For example the forced removal of Poles from west Poland (annexed by USSR) after WW2 for example was not a slaughter, but is considered an act of ethnic cleansing.

I for one welcome our new Chinese overlords, though dealing with censorship in all their web services is gonna be a bit annoying.

Was dying to see some good news, finally.

Had missed this suggestion completely. So, the totally-not-racist-don’t-be-so-sensitive-you-silly-snowflake president’s solution is “how about ethnic cleansing?”.

I was recently in Bosnia and as a consequence read up on the balkan conflict, this quote (about the srebnica massacre) stuck with me:

People are not little stones or keys in someone’s pocket, that can be moved from one place to another just like that. … Therefore, we cannot precisely arrange for only Serbs to stay in one part of the country while removing others painlessly. I do not know how Mr. Krajišnik and Mr. Karadžić will explain that to the world. That is genocide.

I’m Swedish lol

Don’t worry, it will only apply to PoC (/s)

Only way for him to end up not rich is probably by kicking the bucket.

woke_mind_virus deleted rm -rf… wow this guy sure knows his UNIX!

Why are they doing this? Seems detrimental to Russian businesses and also sours relations with their only “friend” in the whole world?