• 0 Posts
  • 31 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle
  • Plus wealth generally means power and connections, all of which makes it easier for someone to get wealthy.

    Microsoft would almost certainly have never become what it is if Bill Microsoft wasn’t wealthy enough to have a family computer ahead of most people being able to have one at home, and his mother wasn’t friends with an IBM chair.

    Naturally, IBM would be much more likely to hire someone who comes with the recommendation of a higher-up than Afferige Mann, who is applying based on an ad in the paper, and has only worked retail.

    Plus wealth gives a safety net. It didn’t matter for Bill if the first few Microsofts failed, he can try again until he hits it big. Afferige has non-such luck. If he starts a company and it folds, he may not have the money to start another.







  • T156@lemmy.worldtoCurated Tumblr@sh.itjust.worksHieroglyph
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    That was the intended audience for the comic at the time, though.

    CAD was very much immature nerd humour (as was the style at the time), and it’d be inevitable that a sudden tonal whiplash to a serious tragedy around a miscarriage, out of seeming nowhere, would be received poorly.












  • T156@lemmy.worldtoCurated Tumblr@sh.itjust.worksTake that, atheists
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Got bored and looked it up, and there aren’t, surprisingly. At least not in the 2019 revision of the Major League Baseball rules. But they do define what a ball is, and isn’t, and a baby is not considered a valid ball (3.01).

    But at least according to Rule 5.01©(1), if part of the baby gets on the batter, they might be considered “hit by pitch”, and therefore eligible to advance to first base. (It would be considered a ‘dead’ ball, which is funny, given the context.)

    The rules aren’t written expecting the ball to break into bits upon impact, so it’d depend on it actually happening to get precedent.

    But at least going by 4.01(a,e), it’s the umpire’s fault for providing an invalid “ball”, and they might have to clean up, since they’re tasked with replacing the “ball” if damaged.