Das ist keine Falschdarstellung, was du gerade machst ist eine unverantwortliche Relativierung dieser Position. Das ist analog zu “AFD ist nicht Ausländerfeindlichkeit, sie wollen nur keine illegalen hier”, einfach Unfug.

Die Linke hat sich klar gegen die Positionierung zum Schutz gegen einen Aggressor positioniert. Mit ist zumindest keine Revidierung dieser Position bekannt.

Das ist Unterstützung. Einfache, klare Unterstützung.

Vergangene Debatten und Abstimmung sind übrigens das Maß der Dinge, nicht last minute Wahlkampf Änderungen.

Um es auch zu sagen: bei praktisch allen anderen Linien sehr ich die Linke als extrem gut auf gestellt. Aber dieses Thema als “Falschdarstellung” ab zu tun ist einfach zu einfach. Die Linke muss sich endlich! entscheiden ob sie Richtung PSD zurück will oder eine links demokratisch europäische Partei sein will - beides geht nicht.

But reinforcement makes you heavier and you’re back to the drawing board!

It might be easier to first chop arms and legs off to save the excess weigh.lt.

Yay a rabbit hole! Thanks for the key words :)

Can you give a link or description how anarchy counts be implement in a easy there is resilient to a subverted centralization of power that does not truly on an active majority?

Because we don’t have that, sadly. And I’ve never seen a concept that takes a silent and passive majority into consideration.

This is a twisting of your words to make you smile, not to offend :)

You identify with the person so arrogant that he tried to cheat not only the gods but death himself, putting the whole of mortal existence in danger - while disliking the hottest bisexual in existence who was tricked into not knowing what reflections were - and then tragically thinking that he met the hottest sea creature in existence!

I wouldn’t say that Germany is the worst.

Because my request to do so is pending since '09.

Not Op here, from what I’ve read is that the answer to that question is unknown but he showed a significant tolerance for some. Does that make it himself fine? In my book: yes.

For me personally it was enoughto leave the project behind as it’s so closely tied to the person.

That’s a call everyone needs to do for themselves though if course

Im not familiar with British law, anyone care to explain why this is capped at 90%? Kinda unintuitive to me.

How about “what I want is beyond my comprehension”?

That’s quite often my default…

For me it’s very simple: NSFW can’t have a general acceptable definition because it depends on culture, background and personal beliefs. There is no way for a collection of communities to have a common definition and even if they would have: enforcement and interpretation is still done by volunteers.

Therefore All is never safe for work unless I know that my tolerance is lower than all communities within lemmy AND I’m fine with an accidental penis or breast due to human error.

I don’t hate that much but I don’t watch him because of the shady selling business hr often does and apparent sponsored content which is not always disclosed (been a while but his channel misrepresented graphics cards benchmarks for example).

It’s like the British yellow press for me: his face alone is enough to discredit the quality of the source. Could it be good? Sure! Will I ever find out? Not anymore.

I use lemmy in two ways: Whitelist: show me my subscriptions and only those (subscribed) Or blacklisted: show me everything else except the things I want to never see.

The latter lead me to this thread! It’s two different experiences for me and I get a bit out of my interest bubble from time to time.

Because it’s basically axiomatic: ssh uses all keys it knows about. The system can’t tell you why it’s not using something it doesn’t know it should be able to use. You can give a -i for the certificate to check if it doesn’t know it because the content is broken or the location.

That said: this doesn’t make -v more useful for cases like this, just because there’s a reason!

And France has a shitload of jobs!

I bet that even your ass is still on your backside so three of three wrong.

You have several long and comprehensive answers so please allow me to add an emotional one:

Fucking compile error in hour six of what you estimated to be a four hour compile job because of a mistake you made that you found within 5 seconds after the error!!

Fucking why doesn’t this compilation start I can’t find my mistake for hours?!

Where does this module come from?! What do you mean “root kit”? Learning was fun!

It all was fun! :)

Two more things to add: you get downvoted not for the content but for the tone. People tend to not respond well to abuse, even if verbal - and at least I read a “make this shit work for me” in between your lines.

And more important: what you are asking is not easy. Wouldn’t be on windows, wouldn’t be on macos (disclaimer: I’ve never set up the arr stack on either but docker runtimes) . You are diving into server software no matter if you’re the only user or not. Either you accept this and the learning curve ahead of you or you give up on it.

Preventing teenage pregnancy by obfuscating sex has the same idea.

I agree with the boundaries part. The second part though: they will figure it out either way… At least my brother did when he was young and our parentsgot a nice lawyer in voice for that (fucked up laws, I know, I know).

Personally I want them to learn about ransomware! If that cost me a PC… My fault.