Private prisons still operate under government oversite and with government founding….

And maybe having private prisons is its own issue entirely…?

That logic still makes no sense and is flawed at its basic starting point. A prison isn’t gonna raise money to get its inmates removed lmfao, they wouldn’t need money, they would just you know… let them out… fuck people are stupid and can’t think for more than 2 seconds.

And none of those people stopped to think for more than 2 seconds. That’s not even a valid line of reasoning.

A prison isn’t going to lease their inmates to a company that wants to get inmates released.

And none of that implies anything about it being “in a prison”

Critical thinking is a seriously lacking trait in today’s age….

You seriously thought a prison would lease its inmates to a company trying to release said inmates…?

That still doesn’t fit with the “in a prison” either.

Critical thinking is seriously lacking in this world.

… so they are using their money makers to get their money makers out of prison…?

Still makes no sense that way, it’s obvious inmates have nothing to do with it.

And what part of “at a prison” means work release anyways?

So they’re gonna raise money to release their money makers? Thats the hitch in the thought process here.

Are people really thinking the government would spend money to grow weed to get people out of prison?

Seems obvious that it’s not actually inmates.

deleted by creator

…. A particle ejected VS Smog… don’t you notice how engines don’t produce smoke in space…? That’s the comparison you should be making.

Using an RCS on earth would look the exact same, other than particles would stick around instead of as you can plainly see in the video, its bursts are IMMEDIATELY gone.

You’re comparing an apple to a piece of steel now, they’re totally different situations and particles.

Not enough to keep ANY atmosphere. This is the part you are hung up on apparently.

Yes nebulae are visible because they are particles spread usually METERS apart, that’s only visible as a cloud THOUSANDS of light years away. If you were in the center of the nebulae it would be invisible from that perspective. Like being on earth and looking at the moon, there wouldn’t be enough density of particles to say, hey there’s “smog” there. Because the particles float away freely, unlike on earth. And they are also helped carried away by solar winds too. Which you know the atmosphere helps prevent on earth on other planetary bodies….

It’s not faster on the moon, there’s no restriction because of the lack of atmosphere.

You need gravity for an atmosphere, and you need an atmosphere to hold other particles. Without both, you CANT have “smog”.

Edit, your line of reasoning isn’t that you think it’s possible to terraform the moon or something is it?

Yes in the same way you can “survive” in the vacuum of space. The moon doesn’t have the gravity potential to hold an atmosphere, so while smog may “appear” it’s be gone just like the person who was alive in the vacuum of space for a few minutes as well.

But that doesn’t mean people can and should claim People can live in the vacuum of space now does it?

You’re describing the act of something vanishing to be honest though.

The moon doesn’t have enough gravity to hold an atmosphere, it’ll always vanish.

That’s good to know, I just didn’t know the context of the 127, and it’s not the same, so that good to know.

Cheers mate.

Ah on my end, both are the same companies IP provider and they are different modem manufacturers. Both were used to log into the modem to change settings.

Does each provider have their own? Most of the ones I’ve had your local network was 192.168.0.1, but my recent one is 10.0.0.1.

It’s all just modem access I’m guessing in the end and they can choose mostly what they want?

How do you think rerouting and traffic notifications would work without back and forth communication? You can of course turn off location services, but than you lose the functionality of these features.

3/6/7 can’t be filled, the hole between 2>3 is plugged.

That’s still not normal dude.

There’s a sentence before that with a major detail you are ignoring.

Unfounded for the main cause, it’s still a cause of the amnesia.

See this quote further down…. You did actually read the article… yeah…? You aren’t just taking a quote of context and using that for the entire basis of your asinine argument… are you…?

But if there are significant memory gaps that may be related to childhood trauma—it may be time to seek support. A therapist is a great place to start. If you sense there’s a medical issue causing your memory loss, give your doctor a call.

So yes, it is absolutely a cause as that SHOULD prove without a doubt….

At the ages they specified, that’s NOT normal, maybe at 60 years yes, but not THAT young. You can’t just ignore key details and make your own story up.

Also, when people say half the time, it’s not a precise amount obviously, and you don’t think that’s not part of people lying to themselves? It’s probably less than half, but they don’t want to admit it, hence the approximation that’s quite obviously not the right amount.

They also stated it was half the time they don’t recall and the other half the story reminded them, so until that point, they didn’t recall anything actually… so why are you making shit up and lying here?