The username is the joke.
I’m not putting in more effort than you clowns unless I feel like it lol
A murder charge is a minimum sentence of 21 years up to life if it had aggravating circumstances like premeditation.
So I guess this means you can be convicted of murder and femicide now and serve double life sentences. What does it accomplish practically aside from responding politically to the murder of that Giulia girl?
Sudo make me a sandwich
Works every time.
There’s also the precarious state of the market that has been making headlines.
It’s absolutely, 100% a spin to try and make us not focus on all the problems they’re causing and refusing to address in any semblance of a humane way. More hate on top of hate.
Great, let’s go into venezuela and kill a shitload of innocent people, a handful of actually bad people, and install some bullshit government which will be overthrown by a worse dictator.
Why the fuck can’t we stay out of foreign countries?
Try Linux lately?
If your use case is general computing, gaming or whatnot, it’s in a great state today.
These companies own or control dozens or hundreds of subsidiaries across the globe.
Just because the parent “company” is subject to a certain CA law, something like Microsoft Australia LLC or similar would be established somewhere in Australia and be subject to Australian law for all it’s Australian employees. If they hire someone in CA the law doesn’t apply to said person who lives in CA, which isn’t going to help all the Australians.
There’s one other guy who this should have happened to that makes news headlines every single day.
Honestly if I was 3-7 years from retirement and I had a choice between a somewhat comfortable prison or going to some shit job because no one will hire me as a felon…
Really depends what their priorities are at that point. Who is left in their life who still cares about them, knowing they were murdering people left and right.
I’m guessing they’ll get out after 16 years and find some way to not work, if they get out.
Usually, there’s a network for IP cameras, with a central server holding the video. There’s then, usually, a firewall to anything outside that, and frequently just a hardline to a monitoring system. (another computer with lots of monitors, typically.)
I hate to say it man, but this assumes someone is going above and beyond to lock down the cameras.
I used to have a milestone implementation where I work. There was a security PC in a security office that has the cameras on and always logged in but nobody shuts down requests for camera access for other users. The flimsiest of justification is all that is necessary for the highest level of leadership to give the go ahead. We do manufacturing and everyone thinks these low quality grainy security cameras are a replacement to going on the floor and actually watching how things are working so dozens of non-security people had access.
When I started everybody was using the same local account to log in. I migrated us to AD authentication (with exception of the security PC) but anybody could still technically reach the camera system from the network.
Absolutely anybody could just enter the IP of a camera on the network though and view what it sees. Every camera had default passwords. We even had some fun brands like Hikvision that were banned in 2022 by the FCC. We had a firewall from the outside world, but a guest network that was not isolated at all.
We’ve migrated to a different solution that cost hundreds of thousands of dollars and over a year of replacing cameras, but still probably a third of people in the org have access to the cameras for bullshit reasons and leadership doesn’t care to shut it down. Thankfully none of them are admins and nobody but myself and a couple of others have any kind of admin level permissions now, but my point is that it’s the wild west out there in terms of IT processes… and often Shadow IT from groups like a security team that isn’t truly tech-savvy ends up running something like this.
If money didn’t flow like water due to a total lack of purchasing controls and nobody complaining about expenditure at the time, we’d still be using the same old security cameras. I can’t imagine the Lourve having much of a budget. museums are run like shitty nonprofits and are held together with string and bubblegum in the US.
It’s Germany, not Louisiana. The logic checks out. They won’t have to work ever again.
So this is here to stay and there’s absolutely no way to stop it from happening. There’s absolutely no way to trace this back to it’s source every time. There’s absolutely no way to prevent anybody from taking a photo from absolutely anywhere as source material to then manipulate it. You won’t fix this by banning AI or whatever term is used for whatever enables this as you can’t stop someone from running software.
It’s not even a new thing, it’s just becoming easier and more accessible and more lifelike. The nature of technology means it will eventually be perfected and widespread. Hollywood has already been using body doubles and computer graphics to allow actresses to not show their actual nude bodies in nude scenes for years.
What you can do without destroying all anonymity and privacy for everyone is find who uploaded or shared something with the goal of harassing someone. This is the means allowing for a detection mechanism to then remediation of said harassment. That’s the real crime right, harassment? Shouldn’t there already be laws and enforcement for harassment?
The root of this problem is simple. The desire to have sex with people, to see them naked, and to otherwise get off is not something that will ever go away for humanity, because it’s ingrained in our nature to procreate. You can’t fix this by brainwashing/training/whatever bullshit psychological solution that is often peddled as a silver bullet for invented problems either.
You can however change the law in your country so that standing menacingly behind a woman is considered harassment and punish them accordingly. If this was done by one or a group of guys in Boston and there were others around, odds are they would experience a lot of pain.
Are they still stopping food shipments too?
Yeah, I know. It’s too bad there is no economic incentive to keep quality high.
Instead sysco, the people who supply something like 90% of us restaurants keeps on making more and more money y/y by adding soybean filler and other shit to their meat. They always find a way to make the change with an excuse like “prices are high right now” - and then they never, EVER go back to how it was unless it’s cheaper. Soybeans never get cheaper, we just keep subsidizing them so sysco can keep using them as filler.
Anyway…
I wish they would just raise prices rather than making everything shittier.
Year after year we eat more disgusting filler laden crap because it’s cheaper than the real mccoy. Sometimes, rarely, the alternative is actually better. Most of the time it’s just depressing and ruins the taste leaving us with just fond memories of how it used to be.
Looking at you, Cadbury.
They probably want this so they can remove anyone who protested and then give bonuses to the ones who were loyal/subservient, and fill in the empty spots with more people who will fall in line and follow orders no matter how illegal they may be.
I ran the X video through a translation app using Turkish to English and got this, which doesn’t really say much. Guessing the translation is terrible.
The translation I got from the video clip in the OP x post is:
“They’re all politicians. They all tried to treat us like bugs, but they treat everyone like that. They tortured greta very badly in front of our eyes. Get up.”
“Evet”[sic]
Guessing this^ was an error in my translation app.
“They persecuted Greta. Greta is still a little child.”
“They killed them. They made them kiss the israeli flag. So they did the same thing as the nazis”
Maybe someone who speaks turkish or whatever language is being spoken can help us understand the beating claim, because so far there is no source for that.
I saw that earlier and it’s really shitty that they have her in a cell that is giving her rashes (probably from bedbugs) and that they’re doing some stupid thing with flags. She did nothing wrong.
Still not the same magnitude of what is described in the X “quote” which has zero sources and no way to verify their translation, for me anyway.
The X quote which has zero source that lines up with it:
“They [Israelis] dragged little Greta [Thunberg] by her hair before our eyes, beat her, and forced her to kiss the Israeli flag. They did everything imaginable to her, as a warning to others,”
Al Jazeera has a different report. They say she was dragged, not beaten.
I cannot understand the language spoken in that X video, there is no translation, and there are no free publicly available no-login X.com video translation options that I can find.
Additionally I cannot find the cnn turk video from this activist on the internet anywhere but this x link.
I would be very surprised if they actually did what this post describes because everyone would be outraged. She’s a sweetheart and so many eyes are watching what they do.
The only reason why the MBAs and Execs have jobs are because the shareholders want more money.
Customers don’t decide company leadership unless it interferes with shareholder or exec goals.
The system of ownership determining everything for everyone is the problem but good luck getting those in power to give up that ownership complex.
Someone needs to bust out the old iraq propaganda minister meme.