Too bad ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Too bad ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
On a certain level it’s healthy that people who have ideologies we disagree with are allowed to participate in discussions, on the other hand on lemmy tankies are an endemic threat because they themselves don’t accept or tolerate opposition, and openly abuse tolerance whenever it’s extended to them.
I suggested this elsewhere but I do think the liberal side of fediverse should build some sort of moderation compact to ensure that neutrality is maintained and that subverting an instance becomes at least harder, if not impossible.
It is when you win them, something Russia still has to figure out.
The difference is that .world admins will ban those people if they break the rules, while .ml ones will ban those who report them.
I mean, we are.
Why would you join an instance where the mods don’t align with your own preferences in terms of moderation?
If there were an instance where the mods were open nazis and banned any pro-LGBT posts, me being on that instance at the very least means I have no problem having to maintain that standard of conduct, if I don’t actively co-sign it.
Having one or two mods who are cunts is one thing, having a whole mod/admin team with an explicit political agenda and line to toe is not the same.
As the son of a geologist: yes.
Also roughly estimating water hardness, and even mineral composition when he was younger and didn’t smoke his taste buds into oblivion.