

Torture isn’t useful as an intelligence-gathering tool, but that’s not what it’s being used for here. Torture works quite well for manufacturing confessions to use as propaganda to justify further killing/torture/other crimes.
Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot Mniot
Torture isn’t useful as an intelligence-gathering tool, but that’s not what it’s being used for here. Torture works quite well for manufacturing confessions to use as propaganda to justify further killing/torture/other crimes.
I notice you asked for an explanation and then only sort-of read the first sentence.
The national parks are amazing. But who knows if they’ll still be around since we’re firing everyone who maintains them. Not sure if the plan is to destroy them or to give them to some oligarch as a little play-area.
There’s substantial Israelis who aren’t calling for genocide. But it’s like the US after 9-11 and they’ve mostly gone into hiding because the right-wing media presence is so overpowering and successful on the “with us or against us” message.
Consent in a situation like this is difficult to establish, to the point of it being pointless. Your comment implies to me that you think if the person said “OK” to a search request then whatever happened next is their own fault.
Consider just the situation where you’re in the immigration line and two uniformed officers walk up to you and say, “please come with us.” If you go with them, is that voluntary? If you say “yes” I just think “voluntary” doesn’t hold much meaning. What happens if you don’t volunteer to go with them? Surely, they say, “come with us now or you’ll be arrested.” And if you don’t volunteer at that point, they’ll physically restrain you and take you away.
Since most people are able to understand the subtext of the situation, they’re able to tell that, “please come with us” actually means “you are required to come with us now. You may either walk of your own accord, or we will take you captive and punish you beyond whatever we initially intended.” So, there’s not any consent happening. Just deciding whether being beaten and dragged away in public would be helpful to you, and in many cases it is not.
You might be confusing US law around unlawful search and seizure with US law around border crossings. While the ACLU’s position is that the 4th amendment trumps CBP, CBP’s position is that it does not and that you cannot stop them.
Just Egg works very well as a sub for liquid eggs, but it’s expensive AF and goes bad fast. I prefer the powdered egg-replacers for baking, because they keep, and outside of baking I like my eggs runny or hard-boiled which Just can’t replicate so I prefer to go without.
Most of my cookie recipes use eggs!
Dead plants from before there were decomposers who could properly devour the corpses. Oil is lich-ferns
Weirdly, I haven’t seen a lot of people who think The Gang in It’s Always Sunny In Philadelphia are cool role models. I guess the difference might be that Rick is canonically a genius where The Gang are canonically morons.
You should be suspicious of American-owned media, but it’s not the case they they are running state-issued propaganda at all times.
Rather, the media is following the interests of its owners: American oligarchs. One of their primary interests is “get more money” and any headline that draws eyeballs serves that end.
So: at least 4 years, probably longer :/
It’s a bad headline: seems easy to believe that there’s just a lot more journalists around today than there were in the world wars.
Much better would be to highlight from the body of the article that the death toll is also more than have been killed in the invasion of Ukraine. That one’s modern, well-covered by media, Russia has repeatedly targeted civilians, and Russia’s been attacking for longer. So to have still killed more journalists makes it clear that it’s deliberate.