As long as it doesn’t hinder his “elbows” any or touch his ears, he’s fine with wearing most costumes/sweaters/shirts. We actually like to joke that he likes them, but I’m pretty sure he’s at best just thankful for the additional warmth.
As long as it doesn’t hinder his “elbows” any or touch his ears, he’s fine with wearing most costumes/sweaters/shirts. We actually like to joke that he likes them, but I’m pretty sure he’s at best just thankful for the additional warmth.
No leaves, but he’s wearing a sweater so that counts.
Not quite as bendy: Enkidu
https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/fewer-vs-less
Essentially, fewer is normally used for discrete numbers of things (e.g. “fewer apples”, “fewer boats”, or “fewer cops”) while less is used for amounts (e.g. “less water”, “less sand”, or “less money”).
As noted in the above link, there are exceptions. However, the exceptions listed are all with “than” or “or” added. Specifically, it’s pointing put that while “fewer items” is correct, “3 items or less” is also considered correct.
In the case of the sign, it is referring to the specific number of officers in the city, so it should use “fewer”. Does it matter? No, not really. Why did I bother saying anything? I got a chance to rep grammar and quote Stannis Baratheon at the same time.
Walmart (US) a while back. I think it was advertised for small dogs.