Are you serious? You’re the one who made the “cloudflare can strongarm the Japanese govt” comment. I can see that you feel strongly about the Japanese media industry but this is the exact cognitive dissonance I’m talking about.
I don’t care what’s good and what’s bad. It’s fucking weird to cheer an international megacorp to ignore the courts of a foreign country.
I just find it weird how big dog bullying the small dog becomes justified when we have a vendetta against the small dog.
Corporation good when piracy
Piefed went down for me so it might just be your location
They always know what’s right, this time acknowledging it happened to be politically beneficial.
On one hand I still believe what I said above and what you just said to be true… You can’t mess up Arch in a way you can’t recover. On the other hand I wish I didn’t dread updating my system because every time I update some random program manages to break.
I’m convinced Arch with archinstall is the easiest Linux to use for users competent with computers. It just requires that the user isn’t afraid of command line interfaces.
I’ve tried the Mint, Ubuntu and uBlue. Had something go wrong with each. Mint didn’t install graphics drivers, Ubuntu had nonsensical design with snap and uBlue corrupted the boot order after a month.
With distros designed to just work it isn’t easy to fix issues when they come up. With Arch there’s no expectation that things work by default, so when something goes wrong you can just make it work again.
I don’t follow your thought process. I didn’t say every running process could kill the lock screen or if it can kill the lock screen it can access everything else, I said any process that kills the lock screen has to be running. And as the attacker with physical access doesn’t know the password they can’t run anything to kill the lock screen. The only way for them to unlock it is if they already have malware on the device, in which case their physical access isn’t the cause of the problem.
How so? The lock screen is to prevent physical access while you’re away, and an attacker can’t kill it without having access in the first place. Any process that can kill it would already have access to your session.
How does it even get into emergency mode without the efi partition?
Elisa would be close to ideal if it didn’t assume music always belong to an album
Pretty sure both have been available through portals for at least a year
I can’t tell if I can’t articulate what I mean well enough or if you’re just reading it in bad faith so I’ll reiterate for the last time.
I have not made a general statement about caring for good in life. I meant that for the question of whether it should be considered okay for megacorps to ignore court orders, what they’re ignoring is irrelevant. Cheering them to do it for a good cause normalizes it for when they do it for bad, which is the majority of the time.
And it is especially off putting how comments like this are much more common when it’s the courts of a non-western country that produced the bad ruling, as if they are less sovereign than an American company.