Love how I came here to comment about Anna’s Archive and every other comment is already the same answer!

Anonamouse is the main private tracker for ebooks and similar.

You’re a bad person and you should feel ashamed. Especially given the current season. Repent or the ghosts of measurements past present and future will be paying you a visit soon.

There’s something horribly offensive about the way the units were converted in this example

Even then. NATO cannot rely on a country that potentially flip flops every 4 years.

Why, though? The usual reasoning for abolishing the death penalty is the argument that we might make a mistake and mistakenly sentence innocent people to death. But what about crimes like this, where the crime is entirely on paper, fully documented, and with no risk that you’re prosecuting the wrong person?

Edit: I’m not sure why I’m getting downvoted with no replies. I’m asking an actual question here, if you disagree why not state your opinion?

It’s great for people who are into it, but what if you just hate gardening?

On the contrary, I would rather NOT go to war. You know what’s the best way to get that to happen? Have a strong enough military that bullies like Putin and Xinnie will think very very carefully before launching a ‘special military operation’ into your country.

Nah, I wasn’t being serious, just making with the funny

Apparently being on private trackers has significantly skewed my sense of what’s normal sharing stats

Don’t forget the postcard to Russia inviting them over for tea

This post uses a gift link which is likely to have a view count limit, and no archived copy is presently available.

Next time, just archive the gift link?

I have the issue with both full height and fixed height images, sadly

His story is pretty unique and he’s already on their hunted list. The pic makes absolutely no difference

You’re missing the point, which is that we don’t normally measure reserves in centuries. We prospect as needed, and there is no reason to think that we would be unable to locate new deposits as necessary. All this and more is covered in the source you linked.

Will get back to you once I’ve had a chance to read through them, but I have no reason to think you’re mistaken.

I did not make any claim. As I said in my first comment, I have no idea what the environmental impact of uranium mining is. My point in the previous comment is merely that using an example from the 1950s is useless as we can find similar environmental disasters for any mineral we were mining in that era.

You did not show any such thing in your other link, rather the exact opposite.

By your logic about environmental impact, we should then stop ALL mining and processing activities because they caused pollution a century ago. That’s obviously not realistic, practical, nor even helpful. It should be based on the technology and environmental impact of today.

You appear to be severely misunderstanding the source. You may want to take the time to read through it again.

Also, did you think we checked each and every resource we industrialised to make sure we had a few millenia worth before we started using them? Last I heard, our known lithium resources are only sufficient for a decade or two at current rates, never mind the increasing usage.

The early and mid 20th century was the era of thousands of Superfund sites. This particular incident doesn’t seem any worse than average. We’re still dealing with the toxic aftermath of mining and processing all sorts of minerals with no regard for the environment during that time. Is uranium actually any worse than any other mineral in that sense?