cross-posted from: https://scribe.disroot.org/post/11900959
cross-posted from: https://scribe.disroot.org/post/11900079
When [Canadian] Prime Minister Mark Carney stood in Beijing in January and said Canada’s new “strategic partnership” with China set both countries up for a “new world order,” it marked a striking reversal. Less than a year earlier, on the election campaign trail, Carney had named China as Canada’s biggest security threat. And a year before the trip, the Hogue Commission’s report on foreign interference concluded that China is the most persistent and sophisticated foreign interference threat to Canada’s democratic institutions and elections.
The deal cut China’s tariff on Canadian canola seed to about 15 percent from 75.8 percent and eased duties on peas, and seafood. In return, Ottawa agreed to let in 49,000 Chinese electric vehicles (EVs) a year at a 6.1 percent tariff, down from 100 percent. The partnership also covers clean energy, multilateral co-operation, people-to-people ties, and public security, including an agreement between the RCMP and China’s Ministry of Public Security, the police apparatus Beijing has used to monitor and intimidate its diaspora abroad.
The pivot comes as Carney rallies middle powers to band together against U.S. tariffs while moving closer to the world’s other superpower. Taiwan, which Beijing refuses to recognize as an independent country, and actively seeks to reunify Taiwan as part of China even by military force, shows how aggressive China can be. And as Chiense coast guard incursions into Taiwan-controlled waters have spiked in 2026, U.S. President Donald Trump has called a stalled $14-billion arms package for the island “a very good negotiating chip” with Beijing, recently adding he isn’t looking to fight a war thousands of miles away.
…
Few Western journalists have watched China’s security apparatus as closely as Jürgen Kremb. A former Der Spiegel bureau chief in Beijing, Singapore, and Vienna who was expelled from China in 1998, he now teaches and conducts research at Soochow University in Taipei as a visiting scholar.
…
The Hub spoke with Kremb about what Canada should learn from Taiwan as it grows its ties to China.
…
Question: … Ottawa has now signed a strategic partnership with Beijing that includes a confidential RCMP agreement with China’s Ministry of Public Security. From where you sit in Taiwan, which has lived with this pressure far longer, does closer engagement with Beijing typically restrain its interference activities abroad, or does it give them more cover and access and embolden them?
Jürgen Kremb: It’s police and domestic security, and they work like the FBI. There are also members of their staff who work as agents, suppressing dissidents and different opinions. This ministry has about 2 million staff in China … and they open police stations in foreign countries, including Canada. The same in Europe and Australia [and other countries]. Of course that’s against the law of other countries, just as the U.S. or Canada cannot open a police station in Beijing.
…
China now is the biggest threat to the security of a lot of countries, because they steal intellectual property, they intimidate their dissidents abroad, they intimidate people who are speaking out against China, they operate a lot of media. So we really have to take the threat seriously… And of course the primary target is Taiwan.
…
Taiwan is the testing ground, [but it’s also being] executed against other democratic societies, the so-called West, but the so-called West also includes South Korea, Japan, Indonesia, etc.
Xi Jinping wants to rule the world–Western politicians simply cannot comprehend this. He wants to destroy the liberal concept of Western democracies because their very existence poses a threat to his dictatorship.
…
Chinese cars are basically spies on four wheels. In Israel, in Sweden or Norway, and in Japan, Chinese cars are not allowed anymore into military installations because where there are cameras, they are actively spying on the surroundings and sending this data back to China.
…
What happens if you work too closely with China? First, you seem to have access to a big, big market and make a lot of money. But one day it’s over, and your whole industry base collapses. So if Canada decides to go that way with closer relations to China, look twice and be very careful, and you could lose more than you gain.
…
If you’re getting very close to China, in the end you might not be in the driver’s seat of your own country or of your key industry, because the Chinese sooner or later will overtake your products and influence your domestic policy.
…
I don’t support the PRC because the CPC calls itself communist, I support it because it has a socialist system. The commanding heights and critical industries in China are overwhelmingly publicly owned, and the state is dominated by the working class through the CPC. Marketization is employed in underdeveloped industries where markets still play a progressive role in accelerating socialization of production and distribution, and as these grow they are folded into the public sector. This is Marxist economics. See Professor Roland Boer’s Socialism with Chinese Characteristics: A Concise Guide for a basic, entry-level explanation that requires no background in Marxist economics. See Cheng Enfu’s handy diagram:
As for having the “fastest growing billionaire class,” China has billionaires because the marketized sector has private property. The acceleration of development speeds up the timeline for collectivizing production and distribution, and the rise of billionaires is the tradeoff. Good thing Marxism isn’t a moralist philosophy that sees private property as a sin, but instead a scientific approach to socialism based on dialectical materialism. The bit about “suppressing worker incomes” is entirely false, worker incomes have been dramatically rising year over year for decades:
I honestly have no clue why you immediately assume I only support China because they call themselves communist. It’s such a bad-faith way to terminate a conversation before it even begins. I support China because of its system, because I am a communist that studies Marxism.
Except it is not really though is it? Only about 7% of the Chinese population belong to the CPC and of that minority only about 32% are workers or farmers with the rest being educated elites, professionals and the oligarch class.
Where has this happened in a meaningful way?
So China are currently on step 2 out of 5, when do they even get to step 4? Trust me bro, they’re going to do it? As the billionaire class grows and becomes more powerful I think one would have to be delusional to think China and China alone are somehow above the human nature we have seen all throughout history. The billionaire class in China will eventually take control of the CCP.
Economics is the softest science going, how can you have a scientific approach based on dialectical materialism, total contradiction in terms. As someone who has studied science in university, you haven’t got a notion of what you are talking about!
Worker incomes have indeed been rising for decades but just like everything else discussed there is a but. The Hukou system, I’m sure you know what this is, prevents the huge numbers of rural migrants getting access to social services. China the socialist paradise has a much weaker social safety net that somewhere like the EU. Rural pensions suck, hospital costs and education require large out of pocket costs, housing, especially in the big cities is still astronomically expensive for the average person.
Wages in China are set by employers, local minimum wages are set by provinces. Independent unions are not permitted so workers have no collective bargaining power.
The suppression of the value of the currency is another way of keeping wages down to boost exports. All of these things sound an awful lot like the theft of surplus value to me.
You claim to study Marxism but are blind to all of the contradictions present. China is just another flavour of authoritarian dictatorship, a country so unsure of itself it censors any mention of Tianemen Square as well as the media it allows it’s people to consume. Like all the other tankies on here, when it comes down to it, you don’t really know what you are talking about, but will blindly defend them because their name has “communist” in it. Marx would be sick. I would advise any teenager interested in socialism to start with Marx, it’s an easy read and a good introduction. Any adult that choses to end with Marx is a problem, the man has been dead for 150 years and economics as a discipline has progressed somewhat since then.