Flathub has replaced its blanket ban on AI-generated applications with a disclosure requirement. Reviewers can still reject submissions, and manifests remain off-limits for AI-generated content.

  • pineapple@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I don’t have an issue with this. If it’s AI you can usually tell, if you can’t tell then even if it’s AI it’s not slop and it’s fine to use.

      • pineapple@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        That goes for AI and human made software. You should only use security critical software that is trusted by the community.

        • starsoaked_lily@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          sure, that’s true, but if we are being serious do you think software made nearly exclusively by a human (or humans) who care or software made mostly by a non-deterministic token generator working on behalf of a human who couldn’t bother to write the code themself is more likely to be maintained long enough to gain community trust

          • pineapple@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Using AI isn’t just a sign of laziness. I don’t see an issue with using the tools available to do something in less time than usual. If a program is vibe coded then of course it’s usually going to be of bad quality, but if it’s a mix of human and human checked AI then it can still be a high quality project.