The rationale is interesting. I’m glad they kept the logo as it’s recycling ♻️

  • phar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I welcome the change. PostmarketOS doesn’t really roll off the tongue

    • davel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      What even was the idea behind the original name? Was “Postmarket” meant to evoke aftermarket, as in an OS you install to replace the original OS that came with your device?

      • quill7513@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Basically, yes, but also not quite no. Market products offer you an initial baseline experience. Aftermarket products offer you an enhanced “better than the average” experience. Postmarket (or postconsumer) products are a de-growth mechanism by which you extend the life of your initial purchase beyond its planned obsolescence. There used to be a really great paper on creating circular economies that accounted for how in the reduce-reuse-recycle cycle our capitalist society has placed all emphasis on recycle when that’s supposed to be the third order option behind reduce (consumption) and reuse (by extending the life of the products you already own) but I can’t seem to find it anymore, but that paper was where the PostmarketOS name came from

    • WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      No, but it was a helluva lot more obvious what it was. I guess I understand their reasoning, but it’s yet another obscure name among the innumerable ones out there already.