My head tells me Linux Mint, but my heart says listen to your head. Why is this hard? 😂

  • bleustenns@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Respectfully huge disagree. Standard Fedora would be better (and is my personal recommendation) since a bunch of administrative command syntax would be different with Atomic. The internet’s going to show troubleshooting advice for the former 9 times out of 10.

    • Clocks [She/They]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      44 minutes ago

      You just described exactly why I would install an Atomic distribution.

      So they can’t run something they don’t understand, and end up nuking their install.

      The biggest differences in usage (dnf vs rpm-ostree) essentially function as a knowledge/intelligence filter to prevent fuckups.

      Everything I value is against “how long it will work without issue”, “how quick is an update”, and finally “how much effort do I need to help maintain it”.

      Atomic systems have netted me positives on all my values. The people I know who used atomic, have only approached me due to edge cases such as specific laptop fan issues, which weren’t hindered by the atomic system.

    • ggiesen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      They’re both terrible choices for a beginner - constant version churn every six months confuses newcomers, some initial brokenness after every new release - Fedora would be the last distro I’d install.