usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 month agoUhhhh WTF Rulelemmy.mlimagemessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up182arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up182arrow-down1imageUhhhh WTF Rulelemmy.mlusernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 month agomessage-square31fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarecore@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down4·1 month ago75% isn’t semantics. it’s a statistic.
minus-squareNEZ27@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-21 month agoYou just said it wasn’t 75%. And quibbling over what constitutes ‘most of’ something’s life is semantics. I reckon plenty of folks would view anything over 50% would likely constitute ‘most of’.
minus-squarecore@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 month agoI never said anything about “most of”.
minus-squarecore@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·1 month agolet me know when you figure out which semantic argument I’m going to be ignoring
minus-squareNEZ27@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoI know how pedants work. You’re not really making a point, just being obtuse for the sake of it.
minus-squarecore@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·1 month agoI said it’s not 75% because the other user claimed it is. it’s not semantics.
75% isn’t semantics. it’s a statistic.
You just said it wasn’t 75%.
And quibbling over what constitutes ‘most of’ something’s life is semantics. I reckon plenty of folks would view anything over 50% would likely constitute ‘most of’.
I never said anything about “most of”.
‘constantly’ then
let me know when you figure out which semantic argument I’m going to be ignoring
I know how pedants work. You’re not really making a point, just being obtuse for the sake of it.
I said it’s not 75% because the other user claimed it is. it’s not semantics.