• ms.lane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It’d be an absolutely huge cost, mind blowing huge-

    But I’ve often wondered why the US doesn’t just extend the Rio Grande through to the pacific. They’d have their own Canal, a natural border to Mexico and it’d be a jobs program for decades.

    • Monument@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Bugs bunny sawing off Florida, but it’s most of the Americas.

      Similarly, the Rio Grande is pretty shallow, and doesn’t go all the way across. It would take a cartoonish amount of effort to get that done.
      It may actually be easier to build a giant solar mirror and use it to melt a path through the Arctic ice, or to hoist the boats into sextouple-wide train tracks and literally run an overland boat train, or possibly to use the money to try to invent teleportation (they would probably fail, but the discoveries generated in their failure would at least be more useful for humanity).

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 minutes ago

        Imagine the amount of work it’d take just for maintenance of a 2800-mile-long canal big enough for ships. And the logistics of one broke down in the middle. And…