KC_Royalz@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 3 hours agoIf you sent a lone modern tank like a Abrams, Leopard, or black panther back to WW2 with a continuous supply of spare parts, ammo, fuel etc. Would it make a difference?message-squaremessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up116arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up115arrow-down1message-squareIf you sent a lone modern tank like a Abrams, Leopard, or black panther back to WW2 with a continuous supply of spare parts, ammo, fuel etc. Would it make a difference?KC_Royalz@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 3 hours agomessage-square14fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareKC_Royalz@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-22 hours agoReally?, I was under the impression today’s armor would just tell tanks from that era that their artillery tickles . While their sabat rounds punch through anything . And with modern optics be able to hit targets from 2 miles
minus-squareAntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 minutes agoThe artillery they were using in WW1 would make you think the world was ending.
minus-squarekayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 hours agoTanks are susceptible to being lit on fire and cooking everyone inside
No
Really?, I was under the impression today’s armor would just tell tanks from that era that their artillery tickles . While their sabat rounds punch through anything . And with modern optics be able to hit targets from 2 miles
The artillery they were using in WW1 would make you think the world was ending.
Tanks are susceptible to being lit on fire and cooking everyone inside