It’s hard for me how he recognizes all the (social) issues with LLMs and still comes to the conclusion that he isn’t in part responsible for them.

  • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    As I said in the also-shared:

    So yes, I use Claude quite a bit while developing xfwl4. I don’t vibe-code

    Those two sentences are mutually exclusive.

    I’m sad to hear that I might have to drop XFCE. Or, at least, stay in the X11 version of it.

    • robsteranium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Vibe coding is accepting changes from the model without reviewing them fully (or trusting models to do the verification).

      She/he is presumably discussing ideas with Claude then reviewing any suggestions before integrating them.

      This may still not be to your taste but it’s not the same as vibe coding. Whether or not they are actually reviewing everything is also a separate question!

      • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        As was said: they are not discussing ideas with Claude. Claude can not discuss ideas. This is vibecoding and trying to gaslight us on it under “b-b-but it’s a thinking machine, bro! We are at the singularity!”