• einkorn@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Is your problem with the news site or the article in particular? Because the only part of the article that I’d complain about is:

    At the same time, the Romanian Armed Forces will not be able to sustain this level of expenditure in the long term if Russian drones continue to violate the country’s airspace as frequently.

    What’s the source of this claim? The overall assessment seems OK to me. NATO forces are regularly using high cost ammunitions to shoot down cheap drones. In the long term that’s a problem.

    • Noodle07@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Romania doesn’t have the same amount of money the USA has for shooting millions of dollar of ammo to drones. Sounds right to me without sources.

    • Leo Dal Pozzo@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Both, but i have a problem with the fact that propaganda is not supposed to be allowed here, but i see daily streams of dubious websites pushing bold and completely unsourced claims. I feel that they are allowed because that’s the propaganda people like. I really hope i would find conversations of higher level around here, but so far it has been quite disappointing