• BartyDeCanter@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    When I was looking at getting a nice laptop instead of my current high end desktop and cheap old laptop setup, I really considered a Framework. But honestly, Thinkpads are cheaper and just as repairable. Yeah, they don’t have the slide out port things, but they just have a lot of ports built in.

    • quick_snail@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      My thinkpad only charges with usb-c, and it’s a loooot harder to resolder those on a thinkpad than hotswap them on the framework

      • BartyDeCanter@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Oh I know, but that’s the only thing that’s more replaceable on a framework than on most Thinkpads. Other than that they are both equally repair/replaceable.

        • funkycarrot@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Yeah, so far from what I’ve seen, buying into the framework ecosystem is only valuable if you will use the modular design to upgrade, for instance to upgrade your main processor or the screen, as new iterations arrive.

          • lemongarlic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Also thinkpads are just way cheaper, you can get a used T14 for like $400 and pretty much any framework is at least like $800

            Thinkpads are so cheap because a million companies buy thousands of them and sell them when they’re a few years old. Not the case with framework