• arsCynic@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    is a non-sequitur argument.

    I think I have to disagree, but I understand where you’re coming from, hence the “arguably”. Believing something is a sin indeed doesn’t equal taking someone’s freedom to do so. However, his revulsion was uttered with such conviction and certain facial expressions that it signaled if he had free rein, he would not tolerate homosexuality at all, i.e., would prohibit it.