I mean, there are definitely arguments for abolishing the ICC. At the best of times they are toothless or, like the Nuremburg Trials, actively platforming and legitimizing those they are ruling against. And the rest of the time they are retroactively justifying the actions of the more imperialist nations… like the USA.
But, like always, the chuds can’t even pretend to have a good reason for what they are advocating for.
I mean, there are definitely arguments for abolishing the ICC. At the best of times they are toothless or, like the Nuremburg Trials, actively platforming and legitimizing those they are ruling against. And the rest of the time they are retroactively justifying the actions of the more imperialist nations… like the USA.
But, like always, the chuds can’t even pretend to have a good reason for what they are advocating for.
Can you give examples of when they’ve done those things?