when@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 16 hours ago[Ethics] Why do people condemn Zoophilia on the basis of other animal's inability to consent but those same people kill animals without asking for their consent? Why such inconsistency?message-squaremessage-square86fedilinkarrow-up171arrow-down120file-text
arrow-up151arrow-down1message-square[Ethics] Why do people condemn Zoophilia on the basis of other animal's inability to consent but those same people kill animals without asking for their consent? Why such inconsistency?when@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 16 hours agomessage-square86fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaregkpy@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up10·16 hours agoSociety condemns one and accepts the other
minus-squarewhen@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·11 hours agoI was looking for the logical consistency. They are accepting killing of animals (murder without consent) while condemning the rape (sex without consent) of animals.
minus-squareDagwoodIII@piefed.socialcakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 hours agoPeople aren’t looking at the animal’s rights. They are condemning the humans who act in a disgusting way. Most people would have the same reaction if you were cohabiting with a lawn mower. Bonus… https://youtu.be/B94lP-fZyLk Gene Wilder makes love to a sheep. SFW
Society condemns one and accepts the other
This is the reason.
I was looking for the logical consistency. They are accepting killing of animals (murder without consent) while condemning the rape (sex without consent) of animals.
People aren’t looking at the animal’s rights.
They are condemning the humans who act in a disgusting way.
Most people would have the same reaction if you were cohabiting with a lawn mower.
Bonus…
https://youtu.be/B94lP-fZyLk
Gene Wilder makes love to a sheep. SFW