They’re basically minimum-viable products that by design can be used to violate the law in California when the Act goes into effect on Jan. 1, 2027.
They’re basically minimum-viable products that by design can be used to violate the law in California when the Act goes into effect on Jan. 1, 2027.
Is there any reason to believe they won’t want to make an example out of intentional violators?
I don’t know, maybe not looking stupid