idk if it is serious or not, but it is what I saw in indeed newsletter today.

  • FishFace@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Developing mission-critical systems in scripting languages

    This is a wild take. If you’d come up in the 80s you’d be complaining about using C instead of hand-writing assembly.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      In the 80s the hand written assembly was more reliable and performant than the C, at least on many of the compilers.

      Even in 1990, I tried to launch a serious project in C++ on the IBM-PC, and the best available compiler was too buggy to use. It did fine for little demo apps, but by the time you wrote code for 2 weeks, you started hitting bugs - not in your code but in the compiler output… we had to fall back to C for the project. Even later, around 1994, we had two C compilers for 6811 work and one of them was garbage, I could hand write the assembly better and faster without even trying hard. The other one was pretty good, and by the late 1990s I stopped looking at C/C++ compilers’ assembly output because it was consistently better than I would write by hand.

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        There were already plenty of reliable compilers at least for the main architectures in use. Replace C with Fortran though if you prefer - complaining about python in mission critical software is a brain-dead take that belongs in the bin of history.