• Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Someone needs to tell this person the difference between testimony, evidence and confession

    • Gonzako@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      For certain! Both my life and that of 3 other guys would have been ruined if the judge chose to just believe the first girl I was with.

      They would later go on to say that they lied on every single one of them. Tho, it didn’t help the youngest one and latest they accused. He still got bullied out of the school they were in.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        People downvoting you cause they can’t handle the truth that stuff like that actually happens. It conflicts with their worldview in which women never lie and men are never falsely accused.

        Say this in some places and they’ll either call you a rapist or a rape apologist. It’s the same as when cops say “If you’re not doing anything wrong then why do you need rights? If you don’t have any drugs then why won’t you let me search your vehicle?”

        Ask them if people should have believed Emmett Till’s accusers and they’ll say “THAT’S DIFFERENT” without really being able to explain how…

        P.S., Epstein is a scumbag and all his associates should burn. Nothing in this comment is intended to be read as an excusal of them, but rather as an argument against overgeneralizing it to treat all men as guilty unless proven innocent

  • Totally Human Emdash User@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I am genuinely very confused by this post. Were there really a lot of people who saw the Epstein files and were like, “Oh, so maybe women were telling the truth after all”? Because all of the reactions I have seen so far are either “I knew it!” or possibly “Whoa, this goes even further than I thought!”

    • its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s devoid of context, but it could just be talking about the people who only just now have begun believing despite the voices of the victims.

      • Totally Human Emdash User@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The post makes it seem like this was a typical perspective, though. I get that womens’ voices are generally not taken seriously enough when it comes to this kind of thing, but if there were one exception to this rule then Epstein seemed to be it because in my experience everyone considered him to be a dirtbag even before the files were released. Have I just been unwittingly sheltered when it comes to peoples’ views on Epstein? (Genuine question.)

        • its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I wouldn’t call it unwittingly sheltered. More like programed by right-wing media to never trust the victim when women step forward.

          • Totally Human Emdash User@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Have I [emphasis mine] just been unwittingly sheltered when it comes to peoples’ views on Epstein? (Genuine question.)

            I wouldn’t call it unwittingly sheltered. More like programed by right-wing media to never trust the victim when women step forward.

            That is a peculiar thing to say about me.

            • its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 hours ago

              I’m sorry I misread your comment. I thought it was speaking generally not you specific. That comment was directed towards the people who are just now coming around and or the ones who are still stubbornly refusing to see the reason.

  • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    People believed them. That’s why there are documents detailing various agencies’ research into Epstein & co.

    If no one believed them, no one would have looked into it.

    Now, the Trump admin and captured agencies are trying to cover it up, redact abusers names, release victims names/info/pictures, cover the whole thing up, etc. But that’s a different story.

  • Limitless_screaming@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    People knew Epstein didn’t kill himself and knew he was killed off to hide lots of terrible things. And of course knew that meant powerful and rich people were involved in unspeakable acts. But then to be able to point fingers at specific people (especially those who are in position that make claims against seem like slander used politically e.g. Trump) you have to get more than claims to implicate them.

    Still, being certain someone committed a crime because multiple people, women, men, cameras or TVs said so doesn’t seem reasonable without evidence.

  • flandish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    11 hours ago

    i hope a snopes but deeper searchable thing comes out that proves claims with citations, and disproves ones (with cits too if able.)

    like how do we know if they were farming babies to turn them into cream cheese?

    but also clearly we know they were doing shit THOUSANDS of victims say an need to be believed.

    fluff an slop will dilute the waters. on purpose. :/