cross-posted from: https://scribe.disroot.org/post/5258553

Archived version

For the second time this year, French President Emmanuel Macron is calling on the European Union to consider using its most powerful economic weapon — the anti-coercion instrument — in a dispute with a major trading partner.

The ACI allows the bloc to deploy an array of measures in response to coercive trade measures, and activating it would represent a significant escalation. For this reason, it has never done so.

**What is the anti-coercion instrument (ACI)? **

It’s the EU’s strongest tool to retaliate against economic or trade duress by a third country. If the bloc decides that it’s being coerced, the ACI would give it cover to hit back with a range of punishments targeting the offending country’s access to one of the world’s biggest and most lucrative markets in goods and services.

With China, such measures may include tariffs on the country’s exports, targeted curbs on its investments in the EU or new taxes on Chinese tech companies. They could also involve limiting access to certain parts of the EU market or restricting Chinese firms from bidding for public contracts in the region.

The EU sees the ACI’s true purpose not as retaliation so much as deterrence, as its provisions are so potentially damaging to a trade partner that the mere threat of applying it means countries will think twice before using trade as a diplomatic weapon.

The … European Commission proposed the ACI in 2021 in response to a series of wake-up calls that showed the bloc’s vulnerability to coercive tactics wielded through trade and investment. These included Trump’s trade actions during his first administration, and a Chinese trade blockade targeting EU member Lithuania over the European nation’s ties with Taiwan.

What is coercion in trade? Trade coercion is the practice of applying trade instruments such as tariffs, anti-dumping measures, quotas and other tools that inflict harm on a trade partner for reasons that aren’t justified under the generally accepted rules of international trade, and which don’t directly address any recognized imbalance or injustice in the trading relationship. The goal instead is to impose economic costs on the target in an arbitrary way as part of a broader diplomatic dispute.

When can the ACI be used?

EU member states decide collectively whether to use the ACI. First it needs to be established that there is coercion by a third country. Response measures can then be adopted via a qualified majority vote, which means gathering the support of 55% of member states that together represent 65% of the total population. This gives the EU’s heavyweights, France and Germany, a significant say over the outcome.

Why is the ACI being talked about now?

China has announced plans to significantly tighten controls on its exports of rare earths and other critical minerals, meaning that overseas sales of items containing even traces of those materials would be impossible without an export license.

Macron told European leaders at a summit on Oct. 23 that the Chinese rules amount to economic coercion and that they should consider using the ACI in response, according to people familiar with the matter. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz confirmed that the anti-coercion tool was discussed at the summit but said no decision had been reached on using it. He said it was up to the European Commission, which handles trade matters for the EU, to decide whether to deploy the ACI.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    China has announced plans to significantly tighten controls on its exports of rare earths and other critical minerals, meaning that overseas sales of items containing even traces of those materials would be impossible without an export license.

    Regardless of whether they do anything with the ACI, I think that it’s be a really good idea to obtain diversified or domestic supply. Doesn’t have to be all domestic, but at least there’s a base to scale up from if the shit really hits the fan, and to cover the most critical needs.

    We started spinning the Mountain Pass Mine back up in the US several years back:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_Pass_Rare_Earth_Mine

    The Mountain Pass Rare Earth Mine and Processing Facility, owned by MP Materials, is an open-pit mine of rare-earth elements on the south flank of the Clark Mountain Range in California, 53 miles (85 km) southwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. In 2020 the mine supplied 15.8% of the world’s rare-earth production. It is the only rare-earth mining and processing facility in the United States.[1][2] It is the largest single known deposit of such minerals.[3]

    From 2022, processing capabilities began again for light rare-earth elements (LREEs). The United States Department of Defense has funded the restoration of processing capabilities for heavy rare-earth metals (HREEs) to reduce supply chain risk.[4] In 2025, the mine was reported as operating.[5]

    I understand that Sweden’s been working on extraction and processing, but I don’t know if that’s sufficient or what the timeframe is. It doesn’t sound like even the initial demonstrator facility is going to be up for another year.

    Early 2023:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-64253708

    Huge rare earth metals discovery in Arctic Sweden

    Europe’s largest deposit of rare earths - which are used from mobile phones to missiles - has been found in Sweden.

    No rare earths are mined in Europe at the moment and a Swedish minister hailed the find as a way of reducing the EU’s dependence on China.

    The discovery is also being seen as “decisive” for the green transition, given the expected rise in demand for electric vehicles and wind turbines.

    Some 98% of rare earths used in the EU in 2021 were imported from China.

    Over one million tonnes are reported to have now been found in Sweden’s far north.

    https://www.chemengonline.com/lkab-begins-construction-of-rare-earth-element-processing-facility-in-sweden-said-to-be-europes-first/

    LKAB (Luleå, Sweden) has now commenced construction of its new Demonstration plant for processing phosphorus and rare earth elements in Luleå. The facility is the first in a planned Industrial park and marks an important step in the company’s ambition to diversify its business with new minerals through improved resource utilization. At the same time, the initiative has clear geopolitical dimensions, with the potential to significantly increase Europe’s self-sufficiency in critical minerals.

    “The world has now turned its attention to metals and minerals once again. We are currently almost entirely dependent on imports for phosphorus and rare earth elements, while demand is rising sharply. By extracting these critical minerals, LKAB can make better use of the material we already mine and strengthen our future competitiveness, while also improving security of supply and preparedness in Europe. This facility is a crucial building block to make that possible,” says Jan Moström, President and CEO of LKAB.

    It is planned to be operational by the end of 2026 and is an important part of the work to develop the full-scale industrial park.