What? I never claimed the reporting is bad. It’s the actions of those psychos that are. The article is fine.
But I honestly don’t think it’s a healthy read, unless you have a strong stomach.
To summarize: But behind the pile of shit is a good overview.
It’s very weirdly worded IMO, he calls it a good overview, as if I had said anything to the contrary, because I recommend people not to read it. But that was not because of the quality, but the issues of the content. Which I think I made pretty clear in my first post.
Behind the Bastards is a podcast. They’re saying the episode this podcast has on this event is a good overview on all the pile of shit people who did this.
What? I never claimed the reporting is bad. It’s the actions of those psychos that are. The article is fine.
But I honestly don’t think it’s a healthy read, unless you have a strong stomach.
He called the events a pile of ahit, not the linked article 😄
To summarize: But behind the pile of shit is a good overview.
It’s very weirdly worded IMO, he calls it a good overview, as if I had said anything to the contrary, because I recommend people not to read it. But that was not because of the quality, but the issues of the content. Which I think I made pretty clear in my first post.
Behind the Bastards is a podcast. They’re saying the episode this podcast has on this event is a good overview on all the pile of shit people who did this.
Ah OK now it makes sense. Thank you.
^this