

Oh, shit. You’re right…I did forget about that. That’s so unbelievably fucked up.


Oh, shit. You’re right…I did forget about that. That’s so unbelievably fucked up.


Except that if the ICC issues arrest warrants for US officials, then any country that is subject to the court, is now obligated to arrest those people if they ever set foot in those countries.
It creates a rather inconvenient conflict of interest amongst US allies. Do they fulfill their obligations to the court? Or do they look the other way, and allow international criminals to walk free in their country?


I’m pretty sure Netanyahu is No. 1. As far as Iran is concerned, Trump is just a moron with a mental disorder.


So, what was the motive then? Other than the Indian government hiring them to do it, that is? I feel like all we got was a scapegoat here.


It’s also banned in a lot of countries for being antisemitic.


So…“from the river to the sea”, then? Netanyahu apparently can’t stop using antisemitic slogans. Hmmm.


(holds up color chart)
Yeah…that checks out. /s


He doesn’t have “ethics”…he just has contracts with both sides in every conflict. He’s probably looking at liability issues, that could cost him a lot of business.


I mean, this case could be used to set the precedent that killing foreign civilians without due process should land the entire chain of command in prison for murder. Right?
I mean, if that’s the outcome they’re really trying to achieve in court, then maybe that also applies to Trump and Hegseth and half a dozen other US officials responsible for the recent boat strikes in the Caribbean? Right?
I mean, Castro might be guilty of four(?) counts? But, Trump and his administration would be guilty of hundreds. Right?


They’re just butt-hurt that Canada isn’t spending the extra money on US weapons. This whole “military spending” thing is nothing but a shakedown to get allies to increase weapons purchases from US manufacturers.


I stand corrected. I guess pardoning this guy was pointless, then. Lol!


So this is why Trump pardoned him, and made sure he got elected. I wonder if folks in Honduras know they got played?


Oh. You mean the illegal tariffs that your own courts won’t even uphold? That threat just doesn’t have the same weight anymore.


I assume the threat is that the US would not support the UK military or in the UN, if Argentina attacked.
That would be a direct violation of Article 5 of the NATO treaty. It’s one thing to refuse to join the US in attacking someone…but, it’s an entirely different story when a NATO member is being attacked.


What is the US’s claim to have the authority to question the UK’s claim to the Falklands’?


And the rest of the world is accusing Trump of being a fuckin’ idiot for joining the attacks on Iran, so…what’s worse?


Remember what used to happen when some out-of-touch rich person gave folks the, “Let them eat cake” speech? Yeah. Good times.


No wonder the Trump administration didn’t want to release the ceasefire conditions.


Oh. Yeah. Someone should probably tell them that Pete Hegseth and Donald Trump don’t care about civilian casualties. In fact, they might even be more likely to attack those targets, knowing civilians will be there.
Remember when the Biden Crime Family just openly charged fees for insider trading information?
Yeah. Me neither.